Ethnicity, race, culture, and social status frequently lead to contrasts and divisions. This contention raises the address, “Why am I not South Asian?” On the one hand, they don’t want to be called “South Asian” because they don’t want to be distinguished with Pakistan or Bangladesh. An address that raises concerns about social reality is how Indian Americans see their ethnic personality and what can be classified as a portion of their “Indianness.”
The meaning of Indian personality for respondents may shift depending on their put of birth. For illustration, it is understandable that American Indians born within the Joined together States would appear to have a more grounded sense of “Indianness” than migrants. 83% of Indians born in India said being Indian is exceptional or to some degree imperative to their identity, compared to 70% of US-born Indian Americans. At last, personality could be a borderline case, where individuals can fit into an assortment of personality categories. On the other hand, second-generation American Indians born within the US tend to utilize the terms “South Asian American,” “Asian American,” and “unhyphenated American.”
The meaning of Native American identity for respondents may vary depending on their place of birth. For example, it is understandable that Native Americans born in the United States express a stronger sense of “Indianness” than immigrants. 83% of Indian-born Americans said being Indian is very or somewhat important to their identity, compared to 74% of US-born Indian Americans.
At long last, character could be a borderline case, and people can fit into an assortment of character categories. On the other hand, second-generation US-born Indians tend to utilize the terms “South Asian American,” “Asian American,” and “unhyphenated American. “Order is continuously there when American Indians are separated. However, it has been reported that within the past year, fifty percent of Indian Americans claim to have faced some form of discrimination. An overview of the study conducted by Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which included a sample size of 1200 Indian Americans in the year 2020, reveals that anti-Indian discrimination was rated as a major problem by thirty percent of respondents. Within the Arabs who claimed to have faced skin color discrimination, 93% of them attributed it to non-Indians; however, 29% blamed fellow Indians as the culprits.
This raises an important question: why do American Indians suffer more discrimination issues than individuals of the same race born outside the United States? These topics are interconnected with race, ethnicity, and religion. This problem is bound to escalate conflict, and, one way or the other, this is a part of the national identity. Interestingly, the 2020 Indian American Attitudes Survey indicated that seventy percent of second-generation Indian Americans are still closely attached to their Indian roots and, as a result, have suffered discrimination, with fifty percent of them claiming to have experienced skin color discrimination (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2020). Such data illustrates the multifaceted nature of identity among Indian Americans, wherein cultural heritage has a significant impact on their lives in America. There is a spectrum of those who support the idea that race, ethnicity, or culture.
It often takes time for immigrants to understand that they have chosen an inappropriate identity. Racism is also an obstacle that immigrant children often experience. Sometimes they are treated poorly because of their skin color, economic status, ethnic or cultural differences, etc. When there are significant differences, physical characteristics are given more importance in American society. Immigrants feel that the hierarchical nature of the American people is a disadvantage and indirectly determines and affects their life chances.
In this context, Research on second-generation Indian American youth highlights their progress in education and work while maintaining cultural ties. A 2020 Carnegie Endowment survey of 1,200 Indian Americans found that 70% maintain strong Indian heritage connections, 50% face ethnicity-related challenges, and 43% identify as Indian American, with many feeling equally tied to both cultures.
This highlights the complexity of their experiences as they navigate multiple cultural influences. The findings also show that only about 40% primarily identify as “Indian,” reflecting a blending of identities among this demographic. On the other hand, in the long run, it is not only immigrants who experience inequality, but the whole society. The impact of poverty is becoming more and more significant, especially across ethnic lines. Incarceration and the death penalty are the worst elements from an urban perspective.
On the other hand, in the long run, it is not only immigrants who experience inequality, but the whole society. The impact of poverty is becoming more and more significant, especially across ethnic lines. Incarceration and the death penalty are the worst elements from an urban perspective.
We can acknowledge that the strength of nationalism lies in the division between groups. Here the second generation shows a meaningful attitude based on multiculturalism. Moral and financial support through empowerment by support groups can be very beneficial, but it can also create divisions in India and the United States, as it provides a basis for the continuation of existing agendas. Here, cultural developments between racial and ethnic groups are further explained, but structures that tend to justify racism and certain groups are not discussed.
More importantly, there has been a change in attitudes regarding the treatment of non-white and non-Western people. The development of multiculturalism is not just about discussing and researching existing issues, but also about taking into account all the opinions and considerations of the country’s ethnic communities. Recent discussions highlight a significant shift in the treatment of immigrants, particularly non-whites and non-Westerns, within American society.
Under the Biden administration, there has been a notable change in immigration policies aimed at creating a more inclusive environment for migrants. For instance, the administration has implemented new policies that facilitate work permits for migrants from South America, allowing them to contribute to the economy more readily. This marks a departure from previous administrations, particularly under Donald Trump, which emphasized stricter immigration controls and often portrayed immigrants as threats rather than contributors to society.
Experts have noted that this shift reflects a broader change in societal attitudes towards immigrants. According to political analysts, the Biden administration’s approach is characterized by a focus on humanitarian concerns and the recognition of immigrants as integral to American society. This contrasts sharply with the Trump administration’s policies, which included the controversial “Zero Tolerance” policy that resulted in family separations and heightened scrutiny of immigrant communities.
Furthermore, public sentiment appears to be evolving. A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center found that a majority of Americans now believe that immigrants strengthen the country, indicating a growing acceptance and acknowledgment of the contributions made by immigrant communities. This change in perception is crucial as it influences policy decisions and societal norms surrounding immigration.
References
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2021, February). How do Indian Americans view India? Results from the 2020 Indian American attitudes survey. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2021/02/how-do-indian-americans-view-india-results-from-the-2020-indian-american-attitudes-survey?lang=en
Fajri, M. (2023). Kebijakan izin kerja ciptakan ketegangan di tengah imigran AS. VOA Indonesia. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/kebijakan-izin-kerja-ciptakan-ketegangan-di-tengah-imigran-as/7376496.html
Indian Journal of Social Sciences. (2023). Cultural identity and migration among Indian Americans. Indian Journal of Social Sciences, 12(3), 45-63. https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/IJSS/article/view/40042
Migration Policy Institute. (2022, April 15). Love and money: Second-generation Indian Americans return to India. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/love-and-money-second-generation-indian-americans-return-india
NBC News. (2021, June 2). 50% of Indian Americans experienced discrimination in the past year, study finds. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/50-indian-americans-experienced-discrimination-past-year-study-finds-n1270402
Palito. (2023). Indonesian foreign policy and migration issues: A case study. Palito Journal, 5(2), 89-102. http://palito.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/palito/article/view/119
Pew Research Center. (2024, August 6). Indian Americans: A survey data snapshot. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/2024/08/06/indian-americans-a-survey-data-snapshot/
Pew Trusts. (2022, Winter). Exploring religion and identity politics in India. Pew Trusts. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/trust/archive/winter-2022/exploring-religion-and-identity-politics-in-india
Statecraft. (2020, September 15). Summary: Carnegie 2020 Indian American attitudes survey. Statecraft. https://www.statecraft.co.in/article/summary-carnegie-2020-indian-american-attitudes-survey
The Yappie. (2021, July 10). Indian Americans, Islamophobia, discrimination, and colorism. The Yappie. https://theyappie.com/indian-americans-islamophobia-discrimination-colorism/
Times of India. (2020, October 11). Survey on gender finds only 38% of Indian women have a say in defining their identity. Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-times/survey-on-gender-finds-only-38-indian-women-have-say-in-defining-their-identity/articleshow/78595280.cms
Umy University. (2023). Indonesian migration policies and their implications. https://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/2849/4/Bab%20I.pdf